<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I Like USB Flash Drives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://codingexperiments.com/why-i-like-usb-flash-drives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://codingexperiments.com/why-i-like-usb-flash-drives/</link>
	<description>$ sudo make money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 19:53:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlord</title>
		<link>http://codingexperiments.com/why-i-like-usb-flash-drives/comment-page-1/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>mlord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codingexperiments.com/?p=621#comment-661</guid>
		<description>&gt; ..rather cheap compared to a whole new hard drive..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Err. while I agree with the other points, this one is just plain rubbish.&lt;br&gt;A 250GB hard drive is well under $100 in most markets now, but a&lt;br&gt;comparable amout of flash (for backups) is way WAY more expensive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; ..rather cheap compared to a whole new hard drive..</p>
<p>Err. while I agree with the other points, this one is just plain rubbish.<br />A 250GB hard drive is well under $100 in most markets now, but a<br />comparable amout of flash (for backups) is way WAY more expensive.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlord</title>
		<link>http://codingexperiments.com/why-i-like-usb-flash-drives/comment-page-1/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>mlord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codingexperiments.com/?p=621#comment-431</guid>
		<description>&gt; ..rather cheap compared to a whole new hard drive..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Err. while I agree with the other points, this one is just plain rubbish.&lt;br&gt;A 250GB hard drive is well under $100 in most markets now, but a&lt;br&gt;comparable amout of flash (for backups) is way WAY more expensive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; ..rather cheap compared to a whole new hard drive..</p>
<p>Err. while I agree with the other points, this one is just plain rubbish.<br />A 250GB hard drive is well under $100 in most markets now, but a<br />comparable amout of flash (for backups) is way WAY more expensive.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://codingexperiments.com/why-i-like-usb-flash-drives/comment-page-1/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 02:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codingexperiments.com/?p=621#comment-662</guid>
		<description>Be careful about your USB flash disk!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I heard some stories that USB flash drive can be a dangerous device for secure backup. It can damage your data without a notice. First, compare flash disk to legacy hard disk. When a data is damaged, you will receive a warning that a sector cannot be read. In the case of flash disk, it is different, there is no warning when your data are damaged!! It is even possible, that in one millisecond, several &quot;sectors&quot; at your flash disk are damaged. Several sectors can be overwritten without notice (you write to sector 123 but there is an electrical or firmware problem and other sectors are overwritten too.  It is difficult to detect such random corruptions when you store data to common filesystem (FAT, NTFS, ext3). You noticed in the article that number of writes is limited and in some time sectors at flash disk can die. Is there a support in your OS to detect and workaround &quot;damaged&quot; sectors?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most of issues with legacy hard disks were already addressed (SMART, sector reallocation, etc). USB flash disks are at the begging of this journey jet. We don&#039;t have file system that will address data corruption and sector reallocation. Be very careful when you store your important files to USB flash drive... Add some checksum, maybe store files to ZIP archive (ZIP archive has embedded  checksum), maybe store files in several copies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful about your USB flash disk!</p>
<p>I heard some stories that USB flash drive can be a dangerous device for secure backup. It can damage your data without a notice. First, compare flash disk to legacy hard disk. When a data is damaged, you will receive a warning that a sector cannot be read. In the case of flash disk, it is different, there is no warning when your data are damaged!! It is even possible, that in one millisecond, several &#8220;sectors&#8221; at your flash disk are damaged. Several sectors can be overwritten without notice (you write to sector 123 but there is an electrical or firmware problem and other sectors are overwritten too.  It is difficult to detect such random corruptions when you store data to common filesystem (FAT, NTFS, ext3). You noticed in the article that number of writes is limited and in some time sectors at flash disk can die. Is there a support in your OS to detect and workaround &#8220;damaged&#8221; sectors?</p>
<p>Most of issues with legacy hard disks were already addressed (SMART, sector reallocation, etc). USB flash disks are at the begging of this journey jet. We don&#39;t have file system that will address data corruption and sector reallocation. Be very careful when you store your important files to USB flash drive&#8230; Add some checksum, maybe store files to ZIP archive (ZIP archive has embedded  checksum), maybe store files in several copies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://codingexperiments.com/why-i-like-usb-flash-drives/comment-page-1/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codingexperiments.com/?p=621#comment-430</guid>
		<description>Be careful about your USB flash disk!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I heard some stories that USB flash drive can be a dangerous device for secure backup. It can damage your data without a notice. First, compare flash disk to legacy hard disk. When a data is damaged, you will receive a warning that a sector cannot be read. In the case of flash disk, it is different, there is no warning when your data are damaged!! It is even possible, that in one millisecond, several &quot;sectors&quot; at your flash disk are damaged. Several sectors can be overwritten without notice (you write to sector 123 but there is an electrical or firmware problem and other sectors are overwritten too.  It is difficult to detect such random corruptions when you store data to common filesystem (FAT, NTFS, ext3). You noticed in the article that number of writes is limited and in some time sectors at flash disk can die. Is there a support in your OS to detect and workaround &quot;damaged&quot; sectors?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most of issues with legacy hard disks were already addressed (SMART, sector reallocation, etc). USB flash disks are at the begging of this journey jet. We don&#039;t have file system that will address data corruption and sector reallocation. Be very careful when you store your important files to USB flash drive... Add some checksum, maybe store files to ZIP archive (ZIP archive has embedded  checksum), maybe store files in several copies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful about your USB flash disk!</p>
<p>I heard some stories that USB flash drive can be a dangerous device for secure backup. It can damage your data without a notice. First, compare flash disk to legacy hard disk. When a data is damaged, you will receive a warning that a sector cannot be read. In the case of flash disk, it is different, there is no warning when your data are damaged!! It is even possible, that in one millisecond, several &#8220;sectors&#8221; at your flash disk are damaged. Several sectors can be overwritten without notice (you write to sector 123 but there is an electrical or firmware problem and other sectors are overwritten too.  It is difficult to detect such random corruptions when you store data to common filesystem (FAT, NTFS, ext3). You noticed in the article that number of writes is limited and in some time sectors at flash disk can die. Is there a support in your OS to detect and workaround &#8220;damaged&#8221; sectors?</p>
<p>Most of issues with legacy hard disks were already addressed (SMART, sector reallocation, etc). USB flash disks are at the begging of this journey jet. We don&#39;t have file system that will address data corruption and sector reallocation. Be very careful when you store your important files to USB flash drive&#8230; Add some checksum, maybe store files to ZIP archive (ZIP archive has embedded  checksum), maybe store files in several copies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Television Spy</title>
		<link>http://codingexperiments.com/why-i-like-usb-flash-drives/comment-page-1/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator>Television Spy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codingexperiments.com/?p=621#comment-663</guid>
		<description>Yeah USB drives can be used for more then just storage, also boot cds (Linux and Windows), mountable cds (ISO images) and more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah USB drives can be used for more then just storage, also boot cds (Linux and Windows), mountable cds (ISO images) and more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Television Spy</title>
		<link>http://codingexperiments.com/why-i-like-usb-flash-drives/comment-page-1/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Television Spy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 05:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codingexperiments.com/?p=621#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Yeah USB drives can be used for more then just storage, also boot cds (Linux and Windows), mountable cds (ISO images) and more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah USB drives can be used for more then just storage, also boot cds (Linux and Windows), mountable cds (ISO images) and more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jairo Mayorga</title>
		<link>http://codingexperiments.com/why-i-like-usb-flash-drives/comment-page-1/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>Jairo Mayorga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 21:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codingexperiments.com/?p=621#comment-664</guid>
		<description>Please look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pendrivelinux.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.pendrivelinux.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.distrowatch.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.distrowatch.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rudd-o.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.rudd-o.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please look at <a href="http://www.pendrivelinux.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.pendrivelinux.com</a>, <a href="http://www.distrowatch.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.distrowatch.com</a> and <a href="http://www.rudd-o.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.rudd-o.com</a><br />Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le Hoang Long</title>
		<link>http://codingexperiments.com/why-i-like-usb-flash-drives/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Le Hoang Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codingexperiments.com/?p=621#comment-665</guid>
		<description>Using usb as root driver is a good idea &lt;br&gt;but there aren&#039;t many linux os that can run on usb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using usb as root driver is a good idea <br />but there aren&#39;t many linux os that can run on usb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jairo Mayorga</title>
		<link>http://codingexperiments.com/why-i-like-usb-flash-drives/comment-page-1/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Jairo Mayorga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codingexperiments.com/?p=621#comment-428</guid>
		<description>Please look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pendrivelinux.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.pendrivelinux.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.distrowatch.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.distrowatch.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rudd-o.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.rudd-o.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please look at <a href="http://www.pendrivelinux.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.pendrivelinux.com</a>, <a href="http://www.distrowatch.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.distrowatch.com</a> and <a href="http://www.rudd-o.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.rudd-o.com</a><br />Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le Hoang Long</title>
		<link>http://codingexperiments.com/why-i-like-usb-flash-drives/comment-page-1/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>Le Hoang Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codingexperiments.com/?p=621#comment-427</guid>
		<description>Using usb as root driver is a good idea &lt;br&gt;but there aren&#039;t many linux os that can run on usb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using usb as root driver is a good idea <br />but there aren&#39;t many linux os that can run on usb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
