• Home

CodingExperiments.com

Linux, PHP, and the blogosphere

Search

Category:

  • Apple Inc.
  • Apps
  • Facts
  • Fun
  • Google
  • Ideas
  • Internet
  • Linux
  • Microsoft
  • PHP
  • Programming
  • Rants
  • Security
  • Uncategorized
  • web 2.0

Archives:

  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007

Pages

  • About
    • The Authors
  • Commenting your code
  • How to Write Papers with Groff
  • ModCMS Anti-Spam Component Set
  • ModCMS Technical Specifications
  • Regular Expressions Guessing Game
  • Saving code directly to a web server
  • The (Almost) Perfect PHP 404 Page

Meta:

  • RSS
  • Comments RSS

Awesomeness tracker

CodingExperiments at Blogged View blog authority
Free Page Rank Tool

What FriendFeed Needs to Do to Reach the Average Person

June 19th, 2008 by Rishabh Mishra

FriendFeed, right now, is mostly an early adopter thing. There are two things that FriendFeed is for:

  • Seeing the activity from many web services all in one place.
  • Discovering new content.

You could argue that FriendFeed is also for discussion, but I think that the two that I listed above are a bit more important.

When you put all sorts of information in one place, as well as allow the user to discover new content, you can end up with way too much noise all in one place. I’ve written about FriendFeed’s noise before, and said that some people don’t believe that the noise is all bad. But you have to keep in mind that FriendFeed is still an early adopter thing, and early adopters don’t mind noise as much as the average person. It takes a while to wade through all the noise and find something useful. The average person wants to quickly know what is going on in the world.

Traditional media caters to this. You can glance at a set of headlines in a newspaper and get a basic idea of what happened in the world. You can turn on the TV to see reporters give you the news. But FriendFeed doesn’t make it that easy. You have to find the interesting things in a sea of noise.

What FriendFeed needs to do to reach the average person is to find a way to drastically reduce noise without alienating the early adopters that have given feedback to the FriendFeed developers.

One way of reducing noise is reducing the capability to discover content. One way that FriendFeed alows content discovery is by “friend-of-friend” entries that you can see in FriendFeed. If you don’t know about friend-of-friend, it basically shows updates from person B if person A (your friend) “liked” or commented on person B’s item. It allows you to find more interesting people.

FriendFeed already allows you to hide friend-of-friend entries, but it may not always be obvious to the average person. What I think is a good solution would be for FriendFeed to hide friend-of-friend by default. Friend-of-friend shouldn’t completely die, though. There should be an option to turn it back on, for those that are okay with a little more noise.

Another problem with FriendFeed is the content duplication. If Friend A posts a blog post, and then Friends B and C share that blog post in Google Reader, you have three entries about the same thing floating around. When FriendFeed gets the capability to merge these, that will also be a major noise-reducer.

The average person might not know how to expertly use the FriendFeed “hide” link. FriendFeed should display tips to new users on how to use FriendFeed features, like the hide command, that might be less obvious to the average user.

To sum it up, what I believe FriendFeed needs to do is:

  • Reduce noise by disabling friend-of-friend entries by default, but allow users to enable it if they choose to.
  • Reduce noise by merging entries that link to the same page.
  • Display tips to educate the average person on how to expertly use FriendFeed.


Posted in Apps, Uncategorized |

  • claudio
    Mmh, no... disabling f-of-f by default is not a wise choice. Giving that this is a FrFe "powerful" feature, how do you will discover it? Reading a doc? mmmh... I'm very careful with adding friends, and by now I've been not disturbed by noise. When (if) I will, the I'll search a way to DISABLE the f-of-f feature.
  • Rishabh Mishra (possible248)
    Yes, many people on FriendFeed have told me that they really like the friend-of-friend feature. The reason I said that it should be disabled by default is that many average users are currently skeptical of FriendFeed, so FriendFeed has to exceed the expectations of these average users, and not be too noisy.

    Considering that the current crowd at FriendFeed is technically capable enough to be able to find the feature and enable it if it was disabled. I would think that there would be users that give up before finding how to disable friend-of-friend, if it were enabled by default, like now.

    The current way of disabling friend-of-friend, by using the "hide" link and then clicking "See options for hiding other items like this" to get to the option where you can hide friend-of-friend. That isn't obvious to the average user, and it's easier just to give up FriendFeed than to try to reduce the noise that comes through.

    One alternative suggestion that I really like is from Tsega Dinka saying that there should be a slider that lets you select how much noise you will allow.
  • cherbert15
    How does one disable friend of friend?
  • Rishabh Mishra (possible248)
    Currently, you have to "hide" an item from a friend of friend. After hiding that item, you'll see a link titled "See options for hiding other items like this". Click on that link, and one of the options will be to hide all friend of friend entries.
  • jokeyxero
    I'm thinking that f-of-f doesn't need to be disabled by default. Maybe it should be treated special and be part of the account setup process. "Do you want to see posts by friends of your friends? Yes | No (You can turn it back on later by "unhiding" it)"

    I think the real problem is that the world doesn't know/understand/"get-it" with RSS yet, so adding more services is just as important. I made a comment about LiveJournal users not wanting to switch before, but now that I think about it, most people are really on LJ because of their Friends page, then they have to pay to get a random RSS feed put in. If FF adds LJ support and includes an wizard for importing your LJ friends as imaginary friends then they'd start getting big much quicker.
  • Rishabh Mishra (possible248)
    Yes, many people have suggested that friend-of-friend be part of the signup process.

    Your insight about LiveJournal is interesting. I'm not a LiveJournal user, so I wouldn't know much about it.
blog comments powered by Disqus